“People do not like to think.
If one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always
pleasant.”
― Helen Keller
― Helen Keller
What a scary scenario, if you ask me.
As a teacher, it is my task and, above all, my duty, to raise young people to think, foster and support inquisitive minds. It is also my duty to teach them to weigh data and relevant information in an unbiased manner. As hard as it may sound and be, it is a mission (and teaching, in my book, IS a mission) that should be aimed at educating and encouraging them to not let one’s personal beliefs interfere or stand in the way to pursuing the truth based on facts and concrete evidence.
Unfortunately, as the quote by Helen Keller
suggests, this does not seem to always be the case in our modern world.
True, we are exposed to an abundant amount of
information but are not always given the tools nor the time to address it,
analyze it, form our own opinions and reach our own conclusions about it. Many
opt for the easier, faster way of internalizing it, through immediate absorption,
without bothering to check its accuracy, veracity or separate the essential
from the trivial.
I see such dysfunctional approaches in many of the subjects taught at today’s school. It is reflected in the way students perform on tests or projects. I mostly see it, however, during discussions of current events.
I make it a habit to discuss current events every lesson. The areas we cover include culture, sports, historical events that affect our daily lives and of course, politics. The last two realms are where I encounter such trends as described by Keller, most.
I see such dysfunctional approaches in many of the subjects taught at today’s school. It is reflected in the way students perform on tests or projects. I mostly see it, however, during discussions of current events.
I make it a habit to discuss current events every lesson. The areas we cover include culture, sports, historical events that affect our daily lives and of course, politics. The last two realms are where I encounter such trends as described by Keller, most.
Whatever happened to personal, cultural and
historical integrity, I keep asking myself as I hear students sharing their news
items. In many cases, they parrot what they hear or read in the news outlets without
even one bit of effort to cross reference or check the sources, their
credibility or even accuracy. As far as many are concerned, if it is on the
news or somewhere on the internet, then it is a Gospel.
I fear for their future. To grow up in a world devoid of personal responsibility, honesty yet copiously filled with narratives and semi truths which are planted merely because they suit someone’s agenda, can, in my humble view, only lead to disaster. What I see and what keeps unfolding itself to me is a “herd mentality” at its best.
What is even more scary is the notion that if some pro-intellectualism (as opposed to the titular concept of anti-intellectualism) individuals dare stand up and address such intellectual dishonesty, they are being chastised and isolated.
Permit me, at this point, to quote a well-known Jewish writer, thinker and philosopher, Achad Ha’am. I remember reading him as part of my High School education in Yisrael.
I fear for their future. To grow up in a world devoid of personal responsibility, honesty yet copiously filled with narratives and semi truths which are planted merely because they suit someone’s agenda, can, in my humble view, only lead to disaster. What I see and what keeps unfolding itself to me is a “herd mentality” at its best.
What is even more scary is the notion that if some pro-intellectualism (as opposed to the titular concept of anti-intellectualism) individuals dare stand up and address such intellectual dishonesty, they are being chastised and isolated.
Permit me, at this point, to quote a well-known Jewish writer, thinker and philosopher, Achad Ha’am. I remember reading him as part of my High School education in Yisrael.
Achad Ha’am distinguished between Archaeological
Truth and Historical Truth. They are not necessarily, he claims, one and the
same.
Unlike Archaeological Truth, be it in the form
of exhibits or other, which can confirm real events in the history of mankind, Historical
Truth, unfortunately, is on many occasions, the one that fuels and dictates the
life of humanity. According to Achad Ha’am, whoever leave their mark on humanity’s
timeline, even if they are the figment of someone’s imagination, that entity
becomes a Historical Truth to many. Hardly, the “intellectual” approach to addressing
vital issues, if you ask many educators. Sadly, what we see more and more is
the encouragement to the avoidance of thinking.
Is that the purpose of education? Is this the goal
of imparting knowledge and information? Do we want to create a generation bereft
of the ability and the desire to express, not their own personal truth, but
facts in the form of hard evidence? Can we, at this stage, afford to relinquish
our moral and intellectual compass to truths other than the ones that can be
substantiated, valid and at the same time reasonable as well?
Shabbat Shalom
No comments:
Post a Comment