This article was written jointly by Roger Froikin and Bat-Zion Susskind -Sacks
“Globalization is here to stay.” This is the latest joint declaration of Obama and Merkel.
“Globalization is here to stay.” This is the latest joint declaration of Obama and Merkel.
An objective dictionary definition of the term suggests that
the term means “The process by which businesses or other organizations develop
international influence or start operating on an international scale.”
Apparently, a decent idea aimed at removing barriers, economic and cultural,
between nations and bringing people and societies together. It has been
suggested that it is, according to Jean Monnet, one of the European Union
founders, a way to make war a thing of the past by creating co-dependency and
cooperation. It has been experimented with in various forms for a long time.
Our question then is, has it proved successful? If Obama and
Merkel mean that the process once begun cannot be stopped, maybe they have a
point. But if they meant that “Globalization” is a process so important and so
powerful so that it must ignore its negative consequences in the interest of
some higher goal, they are wrong.
For Roger and myself and for many others, the term
“Globalization” evokes the unavoidable association and recollection of the
biblical story of Babylon. Babylon in turn, conjures anything that goes against
G-d and humanity’s code of moral conduct. We have heard of the “harlot of
Babylon,” the lascivious and immoral conduct of its inhabitants which, we
believe is also hinted at on Leonard Cohen’s song “Dance Me to the End of
Love,” where he says. “Let me feel you moving like they do in Babylon.”
Babylon, as many know, is also the cradle of some of the pagan religions that
sought to compete and destroy Judaism. What “Babylon” was, was a centralization
of all power and influence in a small elite who saw it in their interest to
squash all who dissented - cultures, religions, languages – all had either to
be in the interests of those in control, or had to disappear. A world of
diversity had to become a world of uniformity serving the new order imposed by
those at the top - for the good of all. The problem then – and now, is that
when uniformity is imposed, whose culture, whose rules, whose choices will be
imposed on everyone for the benefit usually of those who are running the game or
have access to those running the game.
The Biblical story of Babylon as recounted in Genesis, like
the idea of modern day concept of globalization, was a counter reaction to
certain realities that needed to be addressed. Prior to the Flood, per
Chabbad.org, people “had been interested only in themselves; they thought of
themselves as supermen and lived each one for himself alone; they used violence
and force against their weaker neighbors, paying no attention to laws and
rules.”
We witness the same phenomenon unfolding itself in front of
us nowadays. Borders are crumbling, economies with different outlooks and
different work ethics are forced to work together removing the rewards from the
hardworking ones and benefiting the less ambitious ones. Individuals who are
yearning for self-expression and practicing their rights for individualism are
silenced and reduced to becoming mere sheep, all for the benefit of a global
society. Individuality and the integrity of one’s own mind lost its
inviolability. The ‘we’ has replaced the ‘I’ leaving us with neither being
capable of guiding humanity anymore.
In theory, Globalization is fine. It has the potential of
being more opportunity and a better life to everyone. In practice, it has been
much less so historically. Somewhere, some place there is the golden mean, the
course of combining the two, enhancing one’s ability for self-expression and
directing it towards benefiting us all. And that “golden mean” can best be
reached by encouraging free and fair trade, allowing market forces, not
bureaucrats and making the decisions balanced by a moral approach that requires
fairness to all.