Sunday, 19 January 2020

Asking the Right Questions




This article was written in Hebrew by Tal Gilad and translated into English by Bat-Zion Susskind-Sacks

Listen and listen well’ you inquisitors, naggers, serial “insultees,“ head hunters, lynch pursuers and KGB operatives of the politically correct.

We are fed up, so fed up with you.

Let is be clear, first and foremost, that I have no issues with gays, bisexuals, multisexuals, lesbians, transgenders or anyone who wishes to have breast implants on their foreheads if this is what makes them happy. As far as I am concerned, let each one do what is good for them, let them enjoy and dance as long as they hurt no one. I have a problem, though, with people why forbid others to speak and think.

Minister of Education Peretz responded very moderately to a provocative and rude question. He is a religious man. Is it possible not to ask him questions related to sex or sexual tendencies? There are those who do not wish to talk about sex all the time. Is it ok? Thank you. However, since you asked, what kind of an answer exactly did you expect? This is his view and it has nothing to do with his role as a Minister of Education. I am unaware of any conversion lessons introduced by him. This is his opinion as a private citizen, the question was phrased and addressed to him as a private citizen and he would not have said anything if he had not been asked in order to utter something that one could have a field trip over.

What was the big deal about it?
“And if one of your children will display a different sexual tendency?”
“My children grew up in a natural and healthy way.”

Wow is me, just horrible, how can a religious man hint that in his view to be heterosexual  is to be normal. The sticker song – to fire, annihilate,  remove,  throw out,  banish, destroy, kick out, insult attach to a pole with a sign that reads:
“ I am a backward person who believes that a family is a mother and father.” Rotten eggs and tomatoes straight to his face.

But try to understand something even deeper, robots of the thought dictatorship. When you ask a person about his children, he does not think about virtual collective of children, the kind you imagine in your progressive eyes that are in constant search of all-think-together. He sees in front of his eyes “his” children.

His children are the apple of his eye; they are the most important thing in his life. He raised them according to his values and world view, raised them, watched over them against any danger and was ready to sacrifice his life for them. As far as he is concerned, they are the purest thing on earth.

One does not ask a father, a religious father, questions the deal with the sexual tendencies of his children. This is impertinence, unlike any other, discourtesy, insensitivity, disrespect, tactless and lacking basic education. Get out of people’s vein, leave their children alone. In fact, that should be considered harassment. On this, one needs to have a lesson plan, what not to ask a father and why questions which start with “and if your child- “  and so on, are hurtful, and unnecessary. Manners before PC

No one disturbs anyone from doing what they feel like doing, how he is doing it and who with. It has been a while since anyone really cares who is gay and who is not and it does not stop them from getting ahead in any area. Involving the children on such topics stems from the same way of thinking according to which children are the property of all, their education is the respo9nsibilityh of society which needs to turn them into “thinkingwell” in the language of Orwell.

Calm down with this Pavlovic shock over each word, each breath, each thought. If I were a gay person reading the words of Minister Peretz, I would shake my head and move to the next page. What is this urgency to get offended, what is this constant need for an adrenaline shot?

Perhaps it is time that people in Peretz’s stature answer simply : ”I request that I not be asked such questions as it hurts me. However, it is easy to suggest it when we are not in the place
 of some sniveling person surprises him with a provocative question in order to get his fiftee4n minutes scandal.

Time for you to recognize the right of a person “to think” differently, especially a religious one, espedcial.ly when it is expressed in re4sponse to a question that was meant exactly that and was phrased for that purpose – to find that shred of the politically incorrect in order to feed professional violently - shaken and awareness engineers.

No comments:

Post a Comment